Beware How You Hasten The Day

For, brothers, you became imitators of the churches of God being in Judea in Christ Jesus, because you also suffered these things by your own fellow countrymen, as they also by the Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, also driving us out, and not pleasing God, and being contrary to all men, hindering us from speaking to the nations in order that they be saved, to fill up their sins always. But the wrath has come on them to the uttermost.
1 Thessalonians 2:14-16

The term “Judeo-Christian,” as it has come to be used, is beyond oxymoronic: it is truly an absurdism. When Judaism and Christianity are properly defined, there is no such actual worldview. The appearing of the Messiah forever determined the new downward trajectory of the former and brought forth the latter as its true fulfillment; and never the twain shall meet. “Judeo-Christian” is simply the (historically new) rhetorical cloak of the zionist-imperialists to excuse their ongoing subversion of many nations; it is a trigger-word coined to demonize all who would dare to oppose the modern-day Judaizers, who have snuck their leaven and mammon into the church for fear of the gospel.

And they have done this most effectively in the west by turning the prophetic scriptures into worldly apocalyptic fantasies, which, because they reject the life-giving Spirit of Christ, require a return to the form of the Law that Christ has already fulfilled, as well as the establishment of an earthly kingdom with earthly Jerusalem (which God destroyed) at its head. Jesus opposed these very men in His own day, saying, “If you were children of Abraham, you would do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill Me, a man who has spoken the truth to you, which I heard alongside of God. Abraham did not do this.” (Jn 8:39-40)

You cannot force the Eschaton. And even if you could, the only biblically prescribed method of “hastening the day of the Lord” is to be a pure and spotless bride for Christ. Whoring around with worldly powers and playing into Jewish fables about the end times will not accomplish that. It may appear to succeed for certain moments, at least for as long as the narrative can be sustained; but it will ultimately fail to achieve such an end. And when the Lord sweeps His true children into a true revival of His heavenly kingdom in their hearts, you will have missed the Spirit. The earthly temple was left with not one stone left standing upon another (Lk 19:44); the heavenly Jerusalem awaits. Take no heed to the rabbis of Sodom and Egypt, where our Lord was crucified.

I have come in the name of My Father, and you do not receive Me. If another comes in his own name, you will receive that one.
How are you able to believe, you who receive glory from one another, and the glory which is from the only God you do not seek?
Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father; there is one accusing you, Moses, in whom you have hoped.
For if you were believing Moses, you would then believe Me; for that one wrote concerning Me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?
John 5:43-47

In Defence of a Brother

A false witness will perish, but the word of a man who hears will endure.
Proverbs 21:28

I am compelled to break momentarilly from my usual format (and even tone) due to a particular greivance which is needlessly ongoing. It is not a matter to which I actually have much to ad, and I would not typically consider speaking of a thing which has nothing to do with me. But I am compelled to speak nonetheless, if perhaps only to show my small audience how perfectly illustrative this matter is of a severe plague among those who name the Name of Christ in our day. The malady of which I speak is the bearing of false witness.

The particular case which I am about to explain in adressing this issue has been a public one for some time, and the accused has reponded publicly to the extent that he needs to: which is not much, considering the glaring lack of integrity and maturity on the part of his accusers.

Any suggestion made that I should not comment on this matter is therefore pointless. It is an already public fiasco to which I seek to add no more fury, but only cool water (for the handful who read this). In fact, by virtue of naive people still wanting to dig up old news like this and call it new, you might consider the present article just another signpost reading: “Been there, done that. Now let us grow up, shall we?”

I believe (or at least hope) that we can learn from matters like this, not to be so foolish.

THE MATTER:

This has been brought to my attention more than once, always by those who learn little except through the teachings of many unstable “christian” internet ministry gurus.

The matter calls into question the integrity of one John MacArthur.

He has more than once been accused of saying that a person can take the mark of the beast and still be saved: and this is almost invariably couched as though he said it in such a way that he treated our salvation flipantly, or that God’s holiness was being trifled with.

THE CASE OF THE ACCUSED:

MacArthur was answering the question of whether an unbeliever could take the mark of the beast and be subsequently be saved afterwards.

His answer was based upon his own eschatological view that the church will be raptured before the mark of the beast is administered; and all those who take this view of end-times must in fact say “yes” to this question if they are going to be biblically consistent, since the scriptures indicate that there are people out of the great tribulation who will be saved.

Additionally, he defends his position with Matthew 12:31: “Therefore I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven people, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven.”

Based on MacArthur’s eschatological position, this would only make sense. And this also brings in some irony, since most of the people accusing him hold to the same view of the end-times: that a rapture of the church occurs before that mark comes.

I do not necessarily agree with this eschatological view personally, but that is not the issue at hand. The issue here is that a man of great integrity is being called into question based upon a stance taken on an eschatological issue. And clearly, for most North American christians,eschatology is very fuzzy due to the mammon-worship and politicizations of their many corrupt instructors over the last century. The man cannot be entirely blamed for his view here.

And if you have actually heard the gospel he preaches, it is the gospel of Jesus Christ. He is neither an antinomian, nor a preacher of works unto salvation. (He is however accused of being both, which is to be expected.)

Now, because I do not hold to MacArthur’s eschatology, I would not answer the same question he was asked even with a qualified “yes” as he did (and I would say that I am being far more consistent with the biblical text therefore); but he clearly did not in the least intend to downplay its seriousness in either case, and he is far from actually preaching a different gospel. Perhaps I should not expect that to be known by those who are quick to accuse him in this matter, since evidently few of them have actually heard much (if any) of the man’s teaching…

THE CASE (& STATE) OF THE ACCUSERS:

MacArthur’s remarks on this matter are constantly being made referrence to in this matter without the consideration of any of this context. He is rarely being actually quoted, and then I have found only in broken fragments.

Among the most popular and highly recommended responses you will find to this matter include that of one Jacob Prasch, a man who so despises almost any notion of God’s sovereignty in salvation, that those who hold to the clear teachings of Romans 9 he calls “satanic” in his frequent, sad, small-screen rants. His countenance in every video I have seen is that of a raving madman with a mere vendetta, not even a raving madman who has encountered God’s mercy and actually has something to say. All of his messages are fraught with bitterness and accusation regarding things which he clearly does not care to know the true substance of, lest it fail to feed his undying rage. This is the depth of character we are dealing with – and he is the most credible accuser according to most.

Prasch does almost convey one fair point through his yelling and seething: a point about how Dr. MacArthur’s cessationism is frequently overbearing and unecessarily divisive; but here Prasch falls into hypocrisy by his own overbearing and unnecessary divisiveness over reformed theology. He is evidently a man obsessed not with the word of God, but rather with his own emotional opinion of others.

This apparent teacher of God’s people also continuez ranting on to display a vulgar twisting of history by accusing John Calvin of ruling Geneva in an “Islamic Jihadi fashion,” charging him directly with the execution of Servetus; whom Calvin actually warned against coming to Geneva because the authorities were already looking for him. Calvin was not yet even a citizen of Geneva at the time; and once the authorities had captured Servetus, he requested that at least they treat him more humanely than to burn him – this was not granted. Such were regretfully the times.

A CALL TO INTEGRITY

It is utterly shameful for those who have a public platform, who should know better than to simply run with a word-of-mouth story without having vetted actual sources, let alone using wisdom and clear thinking once having done so, to run with the rumour anyhow.

Integrity is not optional; but required.
Unstable men despise integrity. They tear it down in others because they themselves have little or none. Do not be seated at their table.

I felt compelled to mount this defense of a man who I am certain would himself rebuke me for my view of the nature of the church, and would be troubled by my continuationism regarding the Spirit’s gifts; but just because someone whom I have no reason to believe is not a brother would ignorantly do these things, does not warrant that I should therefore tolerate his being witnessed against falsely. Let us ensure that we are walking in our own integrity before engaging in the spread of what may turn out to be unsubstantiated or overexaggerated claims regarding another.

John MacArthur will leave an undeniable legacy which has already been a blessing to countless many. The man evidences great integrity. There is arguably incompleteness in his revelation (he would agree, just not regarding what those things are); but we do not help ourselves grow into greater completeness by despising what is good and finding satisfaction in slander and reactionism. This should go without saying.

But sadly the words of our Lord ring all too true, “The sons of this age are more prudent than the sons of light themselves are in their generation.” (Lk 16:9)

Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers; but his delight is in the law of the Lord, and on His law he meditates day and night.
He is like a tree planted by streams of water that yields its fruit in its season, and its leaf does not wither. In all that he does, he prospers.
The wicked are not so, but are like chaff that the wind drives away.
Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment, nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous; for the Lord knows the way of the righteous, but the way of the wicked will perish.
PSALM 1